«

»

Feb 16

This Week’s Big Question: Neanderthal vs Modern Human?

FORA.tv strives to connect smart, passionate audiences to brilliant ideas that are expressed everyday. Each week, our newsletter features a provocative and compelling Big Question, inviting discourse and debate from our community.

This week’s Big Question:

Neanderthal vs Modern Human?

Over the last two decades, new scientific techniques have made fascinating insights into the biology and behavior of Neanderthals possible. Dr. Jean-Jacques Hublin of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology details the discovery of possible genetic integration between Neanderthals and modern humans 60,000 years ago. Meanwhile, Peter McAllister, author of Manthropology: The Science of Why the Modern Male Is Not the Man He Used to Be, compares the muscular size and strength of modern-day humans with that of Neanderthals. By examining fossil records, he determined that a Neanderthal woman could beat the champion arm wrestler Alexey Voevoda. Does the evolutionary success of our own species depend on eliminating or limiting genes that enable superior muscular strength?

Watch and share your thoughts with us in the comments section below.

TWO VIEWS: Dr. Jean-Jacques Hublin and Peter McAllister

Stay tuned to the FORA.tv blog for more info, and visit us on Facebook and Twitter for news and updates on the latest videos from FORA.tv.

Happy Viewing!

Be Sociable, Share!

    1 ping

    1. Tweets that mention This Week’s Big Question: Neanderthal vs Modern Human? -- Topsy.com

      […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by FORA.tv, emonroque. emonroque said: RT @foratv: This Week’s Big Question: Neanderthal vs Modern Human? http://t.co/d2wVXfD […]

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


    three − = 1

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>